Your browser does not support javascript




Hijacking Humanity

Palin: Freedom of press is a ‘privilege’ that media ‘abuses’

October 6th, 2008 by Jonathan

More scary Palin speak this time on the topic of freedom of the press. If anyone is still not convinced that she would make the scariest VP in the history of this country, read below the fold on what she has to say on the topic of freedom of the press.Here are some excerpts from her Fox “interviews” where she rambles on about freedom of the press.

This fragment is particularly telling:

“As we send our young men and women overseas in a war zone to fight for democracy and freedoms, including freedom of the press, we’ve really got to have a mutually beneficial relationship here with those fighting the freedom of the press, and then the press, though not taking advantage and exploiting a situation, perhaps they would want to capture and abuse the privilege. We just want truth, we want fairness, we want balance.”

Yes, it is more incoherent Palinspeak gibberish but let’s put our minds into deciphering what the hell she’s actually trying to say there:

got to have a mutually beneficial relationship here with those fighting the freedom of the press

Say that again, Sarah? We have to have a beneficial relationship with autocrats? Despots? People suppressing free speech? What the hell are you trying to say here?

and then the press, though not taking advantage and exploiting a situation, perhaps they would want to capture and abuse the privilege.

What? Hang on, you really ARE trying to say that the media are “abusing” the “privilege” of free speech. Sarah, I’ve got some news for you, honey. This country was founded on this ancient document called the Constitution that you might have heard of (then again maybe not). Well in case you have heard about it you might also want to read it some time. It’s not very long. And lest you miss the important bit let me draw your attention to this little clause known as the 1st Amendment:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

This shouldn’t be very hard to follow, Sarah. What it’s saying is that in this country, under this constitution the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press is a goddamn RIGHT not a ‘privilege’.

Sarah, if you do not know this, you are not qualified to pass the third grade. I’m not even talking about leading this country. Just go back to being a perky girl in Alaska. You have no business and no knowledge to govern this nation. You are a manifestation of all that is wrong with the education system in this country. Just go away and never come come back.

The Candidates as Trains

October 5th, 2008 by Jonathan

 

Get ready for a collision!

So they say that the economy will crumble in the coming weeks due to hyper-inflation from the passing of this bailout bill.  And on the brighter side, SNL has made a great skit explaining all this so that we may cry with laughter.

Check out the first video:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/05/tina-fey-palin-snl-vp-deb_n_131971.html

I don’t want to be the guy that says ‘told you so” but give me a f**king break.  No one was listening when we were talking about this last year

Will they kill you?

October 5th, 2008 by Jonathan

 

China is calling for a new financial currency.  Does this sound familiar? take a look:

http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSPEK4365020080917

The British Prime Minister is calling for a “New Financial World Order” at the UN.  Does this sound familiar? take a look:

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/british-prime-minister-calls-for-new-financial-world-order-at-un/

Even Bloomberg is reporting that we need a “New Financial World Order.” Does this sound familiar? take a look:

http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=538

The passing of this bailout will cause Hyperinflation.  Get ready everyone, we’re in for a bumpy ride.  Some have argued that this is financial terrorism.  Even congressmen are coming out saying that the bill is being pushed by criminal insiders.  For those who don’t know, Bush already declared himself a dictator.  Have a look:

Just listen to Ron Paul, he has warned about this for many years:

As we watch the last months of Bush, is it a surprise that he leaves with a bang?  The administrations of Bush and Clinton have been responsible for the destruction of the bill of rights, the constitution, the economy and the central way of the world by bringing about the preliminary stages of a New World Order.  When one pays close attention to the history of this situation we find ourselves in today, it can be argued that it traces back to Kennedy.  Some can trace it back to Woodrow Wilson with the passing of the Federal Reserve and the Income Tax.  Others trace this back to the Revolutionary War with the Illuminati.  Some even go as far back as the Jesuits and even further back to the times of Babylon.  Of course this is a brief description of a beautiful tale of war that has been waged on this planet forever and the theme is the age old quest for power and domination.

The point is simple, there is a clear conspiracy to take over the world.  It has been present throughout the ages and has taken on many forms and it has been found in many secret societies.  It has grown many tentacles in its time here on the planet.  Changing tactics and strategy, this conspiracy has evolved to a state nearing completion.   We are now moments away from the “big bang” of this thing.  For those who are familiar with what I am discussing, in the interest of time, I am speaking to those willing on learning.  We watch as the hour nears.  For some of us, this has been our life work.  For others, it has been a journey of re-discovery.  In short, we of the “truth” movement as it is called today have been trying to tell those close to us of this coming disaster for a very long time.

Last week, we came within minutes of martial law.  The stroke of a pen and it would have been reality.  Even with all the warnings I have given my family, still we stand unprepared to handle the crisis.  The hour is dawning on us and the window is closing.  We have no time to discuss this and yet I still feel that those closest to me feel there is nothing we can do.  After spending years collecting and absorbing information from books and research from those who have given their lives to bring this information to us, I receive insults even from some of my closest friends and family questioning my ability to determine what is fact and what is not while they have never lifted a damn finger for this kind of information.

People are so naive that they assume their ignorance to this information is somehow connected to my ability to rationalize what is true and what is not credible.  It is absurd and I can’t stand it at times.  I realized last week that they don’t get it, not because they are incapable, but because they have chosen to isolate themselves from preparations to handle the coming collapse.  They don’t get it because they choose to not care.  That is, with all due respect, unacceptable to those who have died to bring this information to us.  That is a true coward.

In the world of conspiracies, I have read and been convinced of thousands of murders in the name of secrecy and they have all died for what?   I guess we can look now and see that they have died for the ignorance of the masses to continue.  Completely bankrupt of the knowledge that one day, long ago, their fathers stood in the same situation and made that decision to fight the establishment.  We all come from some tribe somewhere and somewhere in our past it was either join with or die trying to fight.  What will you do?

It is a harsh reality to know that I too will stand by and watch as those in power suck the life once again from the good in people.  I will do nothing, and this is the harsh reality of accepting the fate of a coward.   We the people have failed to achieve the once beautiful dream the framers tried to imagine.  We failed not because we did not believe in it, but because we refuse to honor what we once had;  Freedom.  Those lifeless bastards in the elite circles of the Illuminati are wining.

In the darkness comes the cold presence of something far more dangerous than one can imagine.  Shine bright my friends.  Shine brighter than you ever have before, all we have left is our freedom of speech.  In time, and only through time, can we see progress.  Don’t give up, our message is clear.  Maybe someone will listen who can do something about this.

Good luck to you all in this time of great stress on our nation.

Representatives Were Threatened With Martial Law In America Over Bailout Bill

October 4th, 2008 by Jonathan

Was it going to happen?

I had sourcing confirming this last week and was worried about it.  I took the first signs rather too quickly but it seems I was not so paranoid after all.  Have a look:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/october2008/031008Sherman.htm

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
   

A Democratic Congressman has warned that a panic atmosphere is being intentionally created in order to get the financial bailout billed passed, further stating that several members of Congress were told before Monday’s vote that martial law will be instigated in America if the legislation fails.

Congressman Brad Sherman of California’s 27th congressional district told the House in a speech yesterday evening that he personally knew of several Congressional representatives who have said they were threatened with the prospect of all out martial law should they vote in opposition to the $700 billion bailout.

Sherman essentially intimated that powerful forces who want the bill passed have attempted to blackmail elected representatives.

“The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. That atmosphere is not justified.” Sherman stated.

“Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day, another couple of thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.” The Congressman continued.

“That’s what I call fear mongering. Unjustified. Proven wrong. We’ve got a week, we’ve got two weeks to write a good bill. The only way to pass a bad bill is to keep the panic pressure on.” Sherman urged.

Watch Rep. Sherman speaking in the House yesterday:

 

Watch Rep. Sherman’s full speech at CSPAN.

Sherman has been a member of the House of Representatives since 1997 and also serves on the Committee on Financial Services along with Texas Congressman Ron Paul.

On the Eve of a second Congressional vote on the legislation, these revelations show that freedom in America is under direct attack. The Congress should instigate an immediate investigation into these serious allegations to uncover which private individuals and administration officials, if any, are involved with directly threatening a military takeover of the workings of the U.S. government.

Sherman’s comments follow those of Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), who warned Monday that the only information he had received about the bailout was what talking points to use on the American people and that he had been thrown out of meetings for not blindly supporting the bill.

Ominously, Burgess also commented, “Mr. Speaker I understand we are under Martial Law as declared by the speaker last night.”

Rep. Burgess appeared on the Alex Jones show earlier this week to discuss his comments. Subscribers, listen here.

However, it must be stressed that the definition of martial law that Congressman Sherman is referring to is the full blown military suspension of the normal administration of justice, while rep. Burgess was referring to the temporary suspension of the rules and procedures of Congress by its leaders so that a bill can be passed quickly.

Sherman’s allegations of threats against elected representatives have also been echoed by outspoken political activist Lyndon LaRouche who told an audience “There are those in high positions who know that if they don’t allow this bill to pass, that there are people behind the Bush Administration who will force them to pass it or kill them…”. LaRouche stated that well placed sources had told him that the use of armed troops to enforce the passage of the bill is “reality”.

How The Illuminati Controls Politics

October 4th, 2008 by Jonathan

NufffRespect
You Tube
October 1, 2008

This is a very simple animated version of Alex Jones’s talk on the fraudulent left-right 2-party paradigm that we are all locked into. In the original version, Alex uses pen and paper to sketch out the 2-party paradigm.

I was already aware of how the 2-party system is used to contain revolution in most “democratic” countries. But I was very impressed with the way that Alex sketched it out in simple, easy-to-understand terms. I therefore decided to spend an afternoon transferring his sketches into a 2D animation.

It is very important for us all to realise that we are living under a simple but clever system that has been designed to contain revolution whilst projecting the illusion of being a free, fair and open democracy.

The 2-party system provides firm support for the elite to implement their agenda from the top down, whilst the ordinary people at the grassroots level squabble between themselves over which political party is the best.

In reality, it doesn’t matter which of the two parties you vote for because the same agenda will unfold regardless. Hence, both parties are controlled at the very top by the same force.

FBI Prevents Agents from Telling ‘Truth’ About 9/11 on PBS

October 3rd, 2008 by Jonathan

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/spytalk/2008/10/fbi-prevents-agents-from-telli.html

By Jeff Stein | October 1, 2008 6:00 AM | Permalink

The FBI has blocked two of its veteran counterterrorism agents from going public with accusations that the CIA deliberately withheld crucial intelligence before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

FBI Special Agents Mark Rossini and Douglas Miller have asked for permission to appear in an upcoming public television documentary, scheduled to air in January, on pre-9/11 rivalries between the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency.

The program is a spin-off from The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America, by acclaimed investigative reporter James Bamford, due out in a matter of days.

The FBI denied Rossini and Miller permission to participate in the book or the PBS “NOVA” documentary, which is also being written and produced by Bamford, on grounds that the FBI “doesn’t want to stir up old conflicts with the CIA,” according to multiple reliable sources.

Bamford, contacted by phone, said he could not comment because his publisher has embargoed his new book for release around Oct. 10.

The author of two other ground-breaking books on the NSA, Bamford also said his general policy is not to discuss his negotiations for interviews with intelligence agencies.

Pre-9/11 intelligence mishaps have been generally attributed to bureaucratic screw-ups — a “failure to connect the dots,” exacerbated by spy agency rivalries.

But Rossini and Miller, who were assigned to the CIA-run Counterterrorist Center during the run-up to the 9/11 attacks, are prepared to describe on camera how the CIA blocked them from sharing crucial intelligence with FBI headquarters - and then later pressured them not to tell the truth to investigators.

The first allegation is not entirely new, having been reported by author Lawrence Wright in his 2006 book, The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11, among other places.

But what is new is that Rossini and Miller — who still hold sensitive jobs in the FBI, and are identified here for the first time — are prepared to say publicly that, under pressure from the CIA, they kept the full the truth from the Justice Department’s Inspector General, which looked into the FBI’s handling of pre-9/11 intelligence in 2004.

“There was pressure on people not to disclose what really happened,” said sources close to the IG investigation.

Rossini, in particular, is said to have felt threatened that the CIA would have him prosecuted for violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act if he told the IG investigators what really happened inside the CTC.

CIA officials were in the room when he and Miller, as well as a sympathetic CIA officer, were questioned.

The IG investigators showed them copies of CTC intelligence reports and e-mails.

But the FBI agents suddenly couldn’t remember details about who said what, or who reported what, to whom, about the presence of two al Qaeda agents in the U.S. prior to the 9/11 attacks,

The IG investigators were suspicious.

Indeed, their report, which used pseudonyms for the CIA and FBI agents its interviewed — Rossini and Miller were called  “Malcolm” and “Dwight,” a CIA analyst was dubbed “Eric” — hinted at a cover-up.

“When we interviewed all of the individuals involved about the CIR [Current Intelligence Report] they asserted that they recalled nothing about it,” it said

The focus of the IG was what the CIA had witheld about the movement of two al Qaeda operatives, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, from Malaysia to the U.S. in early 2000.

Dwight told the OIG that he did not recall being aware of the information about Mihdhar, did not recall drafting the CIR, did not recall whether he drafted the CIR on his own initiative or at the direction of his supervisor, and did not recall any discussions about the reasons for delaying completion and dissemination of the CIR. Malcolm said he did not recall reviewing any of the cable traffic or any information regarding Hazmi and Mihdhar. Eric told the OIG that he did not recall the CIR.

Subsequently, Rossini and Miller were not subpoenaed by the 9/11 Commission to tell what they knew, even though sources say they were eager to do so.

But he and Miller did come clean during an internal FBI investigation, which remains under wraps.

Sources with direct knowledge of the FBI’s internal probe say that the agents provided the bureau with unadulterated versions of their CTC experiences, including orders they were given by the center’s then-Deputy Director, Tom Wilshire, to withhold intelligence about the movement of al Qaeda operatives into the country from the FBI.

When the agents asked permission to tell that same story on television, the FBI initially agreed, but then cancelled at the last moment, two sources involved in the deliberations said, with the explanation that it didn’t want to risk inflaming the CIA.

The FBI’s top spokesman, Assistant Director John Miller, did not address that issue directly.

But he said that the FBI had withheld permission for the agents to be named in various reports on 9/11 intelligence out of security and privacy concerns.

“These questions were examined extensively by several independent agencies and commissions,” he said via e-mail Wednesday.

“It was determined that the two FBI employees would not be named in those reports because they continue to hold sensitive positions in the FBI as well as Privacy Act issues regarding current and former personnel.”

Agent Douglas Miller has said that he doesn’t have “a rational answer” to explain why the CIA blocked him from sharing information with the bureau, particularly a report of such obvious magnitude about al Qaeda operatives in the U.S.  He speculated that CIA officials at the CTC were annoyed that he had encroached on their territory.

A CIA spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, ridiculed the allegations.

“I have every reason–every reason–to believe that’s complete garbage,” he said in a brief telephone interview. “Not only did the 9/11 Commission look at the matter in detail, but former Director George Tenet wrote about it at some length in his book.”

But the Justice Department Inspector general contradicted Tenet’s assertion that the CIA shared its intelligence on al Qaeda operatives in a timely fashion with the FBI.

“We reviewed whether this information was in fact passed to the FBI by the CIA, and based on the evidence, concluded that while the CIA passed some of the information about Mihdhar to the FBI, it did not contemporaneously pass the information about Mihdhar’s U.S. visa to the FBI,” the IG report said.

“We concluded it was not disclosed by the CIA until late August 2001, shortly before the September 11 terrorist attacks.”

Another intelligence source said the CIA feared that if FBI headquarters learned of the suspects’ arrival in the U.S., it would try to arrest them — and bust up a sensitive CIA operation to penetrate al Qaeda.

Mihdhar and Hazmi were plotting an attack outside of the United States, the CIA believed, and wanted the FBI to stay clear of them.

“They said it has nothing to do with the FBI, the next attack will be in Southeast Asia,” said a source familiar with the details. “They said, ‘It’s none of your business.’”

Rossini and other FBI counterterrorism agents were furious, according to a knowledgeable source. The FBI is responsible for investigating domestic-based plots.

“They’re here!” Rossini protested to his CTC bosses. “It is FBI business.”

The IG report criticized Douglas Miller (”Dwight”) for not ignoring CIA objections and sending his crucially important report on Mihdhar to FBI headquarters.

But Miller, who held the relatively low rank of GS-12 at the time, told investigators that it was unthinkable for him to violate the orders of his CTC superiors. He would have been fired, “sent home,” he told them.

Miller would be happy to give CIA officials the benefit of the doubt in a television interview, he has told friends, conceding that there may have been good reasons for their decisions that he was not aware of.

He has described the CTC as place filled with dedicated professionals who were “America’s lowest paid professional workers on an hourly basis,” for all the pressure-packed time they spent trying to detect terrorist plots.

But unless the FBI changes its mind, he’ll have to keep that story to himself.

There really are no substantive differences between the two major party candidates.

October 2nd, 2008 by Jonathan

 

There really are no substantive differences between the two major party candidates.

Which candidate will dismantle the secret state within the CIA, which has waged a continuous and covert war against peaceful movements throughout the world by aiding and arming repressive regimes who abet the plunder of their nation’s resources by Western elites?

Which candidate will end the fraudulent and unconstitutional War on Drugs, which funds those same CIA campaigns abroad while eroding civil liberties at home?

Which candidate will end the fraudulent and unconstitutional War on Terror, which transforms the Middle East into a breeding ground for radical jihadists who eagerly follow in the footsteps of the CIA-manufactured ones that attacked us on September 11th?

Which candidate will eliminate the Federal Reserve, which places control of our monetary policy and thus economic prosperity into the hands of a supra-elite international cartel of bankers?

Which candidate will repeal the unconstitutional income tax, which feeds the cancer that is the military-industrial complex?

Which candidate will disclose what the government really knows about UFOs?

Which candidate will nullify the authority of sovereignty-eroding global governing organizations, that set policy and law on an international scale without any representation from or accountability to the people of any nation?

Which candidate will start a genuine investigation into 9/11, as opposed to the shameful, underfunded, stonewalled, still-born, whitewash that was the 9/11 Commission Report?

Which candidate will ferret out and bring to trial the traitors in the White House, State Department, Justice Department, Pentagon, Congress, DHS, FBI, CIA, FEMA, and other agencies, who have been responsible for the subterfuge of our democracy, starting with the current president and vice-president?

Which candidate will restore our constitutional republic by drastically reducing the power and scope of the federal government as well as that of the corporate estate?

If you still buy into the stage-managed “left” versus “right” game of political hot-potato that passes for political discourse in our society, these words will probably fall on deaf ears. But if you’re willing to dedicate yourself to seeking the truth of things with an open mind, you’ll soon wise up to the fact that our so-called consensus reality is a well-crafted charade designed to conceal, perpetuate, and expand a globalized power structure which is unmistakably totalitarian in both action and intent.

So, which candidate will truly work to abolish the institutionalized roots of terror, conflict, inequality, injustice, and suffering, in our nation, and throughout the world?

Neither.

And for those out there that are McGoo supporters, I have this to show you.  Please watch the whole thing, you won’t be disappointed:

YES.

October 1st, 2008 by dylan

This isn’t 9/11 related, and you know what?  Deal with it.

This is the best news I’ve gotten in a long time, and I’m sharing it with you all.

Phish is back together.

If you haven’t seen them, now would be a good time.  With all of the problems swirling around this country at the moment, we really could use some kickass music.

The webmaster of Phish.net puts it well:

“Global warming is melting glaciers, the DJIA just had its biggest point dive in history, the US is losing lives and billions in two foreign wars, and a presidential election just weeks away may bring the most votes for a losing candidate in history. But you can rest well, because Phish will reunite …”

CBS News: Palin can’t name one single newspaper or magazine that she has EVER read in her life

October 1st, 2008 by Jonathan

Katie Couric asks her a simple question: What magazines or newspapers did you read regularly before being picked for VP? Palin can’t name one. She does say, however, that she’s “read most of them.” Most of them? What does she think, we’re talking about how many flavors of Ben & Jerry’s she’s ever tried?

Listen people, this is getting out of hand now.  You know, if the world was all right and we weren’t in such a mess right now I could see how it could be a little cute and funny to put this dumb lady in the White House and have her learn on the job.  But you know what, our country is in one of the most critical finnancial situaitons it has been in since the great depression and we are also facing down 2 wars.  One of the wars is admitted on both the left and right as being a complete mistake and it is killing thousands of loyal young men and women.  All of this and we also have the re-ignited conflict with Russia.

This is not a joke anymore.  Sarah Palin is an insult to every hard working woman who has worked to achieve the level of respect that they have always deserved.  This is a serious situation with critical implications placing an airhead who knows nothing in the White House.   Palin has been governor of Alaska for 20 months, that’s it.  She hasn’t even worked in Washington where, even though I hate saying this, they do get some things done.  Washington just doesn’t get thigns done for us.  But that experience is CRITICAL!  So is the fact that Palin got her first passport last year.  This woman doesn’t know what the hell is going on in the world!

Just take a look at these clips I compiled of all the videos on her where you can see for yourself what a dumb ass she is.  Click here

Please people, see to it that McCain and Palin DO NOT win!

and don’t forget:

U.S. DOT “On-Time” Records Of Final Flights Performed By 9/11 Aircraft Apparently Unavailable

September 30th, 2008 by dylan

From Aidan Monaghan at 911blogger…

—– Original Message —–
From: Robert.Monniere@dot.gov
To: a_monaghan@cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:13 PM
Subject: RE: FOIA Request

I received the following response from our Office of Airline Information stating that the agency records indicate that:

“There were no flights in 2001 (August 26 to September 11, 2001) with tail numbers N591UA or N644AA.”

Robert A. Monniere

202-366-5498

RITA’s Office of the Chief Counsel

U.S. DOT

So, the tail numbers that were registered to Flights 93 and 77 are coming up blank.  Let me clarify: according to the DOT, Flights 93 and 77 didn’t exist on 9/11 or before.

… Bueller?  Duh-bunkers?  Anyone?

Update: Arabesque makes a great point …

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=N591UA&distinct_entry=true
USA - New Jersey, September 8, 2001 N591UA (cn 28142/718) Photograph of the ill-fated UA757 as it waits to depart on an early evening flight from EWR. Eerily it made its last flight from the same airport as UA flight 93 less than 4 days later (delivered 1996).”

So, either the DOD is completely lying, or is completely uninformed …

Buy Loose Change Final Cut!

Watch the Films

Join the LC Email List!

Email

June 21st, 8pm

Screening of Final Cut
Lakewood Theater
1825 Abrams Parkway, Dallas, TX 75214,
8/8/08 8:00pm Screening of Loose Change Final Cut All ages. No Cover Charge CATCH A HEALTHY HABIT CAFE 487a Campbell Ave West Haven Ct 06516
9/07/08
United for Truth Rally
Brussels Belgium
http://www.unitedfortruth.org/